U.S.

You are currently browsing articles tagged U.S..

Here’s yet another huge financial story that has been virtually blacked out by the E.U. financial media. Although on the surface, this story appears to be a non-event, if we consider some of the released facts about this case, you will understand why I consider it to be a huge story. On June 8th, the Asia News reported the following story:

“Italy’s financial police (Guardia italiana di Finanza) has seized US bonds worth US 134.5 billion from two Japanese nationals at Chiasso (40 km from Milan) on the border between Italy and Switzerland. They include 249 US Federal Reserve bonds worth US$ 500 million each, plus ten Kennedy bonds and other US government securities worth a billion dollars each. Italian authorities have not yet determined whether they are real or fake, but if they are real the attempt to take them into Switzerland would be the largest financial smuggling operation in history; if they are fake, the matter would be even more mind-boggling because the quality of the counterfeit work is such that the fake bonds are undistinguishable from the real ones.”

Picture of the seized "bonds", via E.U. site Adnkronos.

Picture of the seized "bonds", via E.U. site Adnkronos.

Here are just a few fascinating facts about this case (at least they are being reported as “facts” at this current time):

(1) Though the smugglers have been identified in the press as “Japanese nationals” there has yet to be any confirmation if the smugglers were indeed Japanese or of some other ethnicity. How difficult is it to confirm the ethnicity of the smugglers and why is this information being kept secret?

(2) According to a brief Bloomberg article regarding this story, the seized bearer bonds allegedly were dated as of 1934. Since bearer bonds in denominations of $500 million did not exist in 1934, the bonds were deduced as fake, though the Italian police are still waiting for a declaration regarding the bonds’ authenticity from the SEC. There is something truly “off” about this declaration. How can the quality of the forged bearer bonds be so meticulous that they “are indistinguishable from the real ones”, yet the people involved in the alleged forgery so ill-informed as to not date the bearer bonds with a more recent year that would not immediately identify them as fraudulent? How hard would it have been to date the bearer bonds with a more recent year? An equivalent analogy would be if an expert art forger meticulously re-created a Picasso oil canvas and then erroneously signed the work with the wrong artist’s name. This story just does not add up.

(3) The Bloomberg story also reported that there is no known existence of the alleged 10 Kennedy bonds that were discovered in the smuggler’s suitcases, each with a denomination of $1 billion. Again, this discovery defies any logical explanation. Why would expert counterfeiters make 249 bearer bonds with denominations of $500 million apiece, each indistinguishable from the real thing, and then instead of just making 20 more such bonds, decide to make 10 bonds in denominations of $1 billion a piece in a bearer bond design that has never existed? Were the alleged counterfeiters just too lazy to confirm if Kennedy bearer bonds were ever a legitimately issued security? Again, this story makes no sense.

(4) On March 30, 2009, the US Treasury Department announced that USD $134.5 billion remained in its Troubled Asset Relief Program [TARP]. The stated amount of seized bearer bonds was $134.5 billion. Coincidence?

(5) The two well-dressed Japanese men opted to travel to Chiasso on a local train normally full of Italian manual laborers commuting to Switzerland. If they were really intent on successfully smuggling these bonds, counterfeit or real, why would they not take more care to select a travel route in which it was literally impossible for them not to stick out like two sore thumbs? Again, this part of the story defies all logic.

(6) The bearer bonds were discovered in a hidden briefcase compartment after a customs inspection. Again, if the bonds were indeed authentic and owned by a nation state, they could have been transported in a diplomatic pouch exempt from customs searches that would have guaranteed transport without detection.
Thus, all of the above irreconcilable and illogical points, other than the coincidence of the amount of the bearer bonds exactly matching the remaining TARP fund amount declared on March 30th, seem to indicate that not only were the seized bearer bonds counterfeit, but also that the smugglers were intent on being caught.
Before I continue, let’s review the purpose of bearer bonds.

Here is the Wikipedia definition of bearer bonds:

“A bearer bond is a debt security issued by a business entity, such as a corporation, or by a government. It differs from the more common types of investment securities in that it is unregistered – no records are kept of the owner, or the transactions involving ownership. Whoever physically holds the paper on which the bond is issued owns the instrument. This is useful for investors who wish to retain anonymity. The downside is that in the event of loss or theft, bearer bonds are extremely difficult to recover.”

If you recall the Michael Mann movie “Heat”, starring Robert DeNiro and Al Pacino, during a daring daytime armored car robbery, the criminals specifically targeted millions of dollars of bearer bonds for theft precisely because of the above qualities of bearer bonds that make them very difficult to trace. Again, due to the properties of bearer bonds, it seems highly unlikely that $134.5 billion of bearer bonds would be transported, if they were real, by two men with no security, since theft almost guarantees that they would be lost forever.

Thus far, about the only piece of information that appears to be reliable as reported by various news sources regarding this huge mystery is the remarkable authenticity of the 249 seized bearer bonds in denominations of USD $500 million. If any of the other facts, as they are being reported, are remotely accurate, then the bearer bonds were likely counterfeit. Still, the interesting part of this story, at least to me, is that the smugglers seemed intent on being caught with the counterfeit bonds. This leads me back to my previous question. What possible reason would the smugglers have for wanting to be caught? One of the quickest ways to sabotage and usher in the death of a currency is to raise legitimate questions about its ability to withstand counterfeiting efforts. Prove that counterfeiting is not only possible but highly likely, and the world’s confidence in the sabotaged currency will undoubtedly plummet.

In fact, this very tactic was applied during World War II when the Nazis launched Operation Bernhard in an attempt to crash the British economy by producing, by 1945, 132 million expertly counterfeited British pounds, a figure that represented roughly 15% of all real British pounds in circulation at the time. The counterfeit pounds were produced by expert printers and engravers supervised by an SS officer named Bernhard Krueger. As well, historical evidence exists that the Allies considered launching a counter-counterfeit plan against the Nazis as well. During this time, it was also alleged that the Bank of Italy counterfeited their own money by issuing the same securities twice with identical registered numbers and codes in order. The purpose of this counterfeiting was to secretly expand monetary supply without public transparency or accountability. Perhaps then, this $134.5.billion bearer bond mystery was an attempt of a nation state to shake the world’s confidence in the position of the US dollar as the world’s reserve currency.

There should be little debate that the world’s emerging economies in Russia, Brazil, China and certain Gulf Nations are at economic war today with the world’s Western nations and their economic allies. The currency war being fought today is sure to get much uglier in the foreseeable future, in both open tactics as well as secretly executed tactics. Currently, if the currency war were the world series of poker, the US and the UK would be holding a pair of 2s and relying on nothing but bluffs to keep the rest of the world at bay. Conversely, the Chinese and other emerging nations with large surpluses would be holding straight or royal flushes, and likely quietly maneuvering to go “all in” at some point.

Given that the discovery of $134.5 billion of bearer bonds in the suitcases of two Japanese nationals in Chiasso, Italy on the border of Switzerland qualifies as one of the largest smuggling operations in history, and given the various implications of such an act and the possible players involved, the silence regarding this huge story is simply stunning. It is not a huge story, per se, because of the counterfeiting operation, because accusations and revelations of massive money counterfeiting operations have occured in the past. It is a huge story, rather, due to all the inconsistencies of the story and the potential explanations that could explain these inconsistencies. The larger story at hand is, who are the players (nations) involved, and what was the intention of this likely counterfeiting operation? Maybe the future will reveal the answers to these questions. But maybe not.

Source: http://seekingalpha.com/article/143462-strange-inconsistencies-in-the-134-5-billion-bearer-bond-mystery

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

ABOUT THE MOVIE

Wake up, United States! The federal government is on the brink of a financial meltdown. I.O.U.S.A. boldly examines the rapidly growing national debt and its consequences for the United States and its citizens. Burdened with an ever-expanding government and military, increased international competition, overextended entitlement programs, and debts to foreign countries that are becoming impossible to honor, the U.S. must mend its spendthrift ways or face an economic disaster of epic proportions.

I.O.U.S.A.

Throughout history, the U.S. government has found it nearly impossible to spend only what has been raised through taxes. Wielding candid interviews with both average U.S. taxpayers and government officials, Sundance veteran Patrick Creadon (Wordplay) helps demystify the nation’s financial practices and policies. The film follows former U.S. Comptroller General David Walker as he crisscrosses the country explaining U.S’ unsustainable fiscal policies to its citizens.

With surgical precision, Creadon interweaves archival footage and economic data to paint a vivid and alarming profile of U.S.’ current economic situation. The ultimate power of I.O.U.S.A. is that the film moves beyond doomsday rhetoric to proffer potential financial scenarios and propose solutions about how we can recreate a fiscally sound nation for future generations.

Creadon uses candid interviews and his featured subjects include Warren Buffett, Alan Greenspan, Paul O’Neill, Robert Rubin, and Paul Volcker, along with the Peter G. Peterson Foundation’s own David Walker and Bob Bixby of the Concord Coalition, a Foundation grantee.

Pointedly topical and consummately nonpartisan, I.O.U.S.A. drives home the message that the only time for U.S.’ financial future is now.

“To the U.S. economy what ‘An Inconvenient Truth’ was to the environment.” Reuters

“Resolutely non-partisan… a documentary everyone should see.” – Jeannette Catsoulis, The New York Times

My favorite quotes from I.O.U.S.A. The Movie

Without savings, there is no future.  – Alan Greenspan (the father of cheap credit)

The concepts of sacrificing and building for a better tomorrow have been pushed aside by our live for today, easy credit, and consumption oriented society.  – Narrator

The only situation that is worse than this [i.e. our national debt], would be a terrorist getting their hands on a nuclear device and using it against us.  The national debt issue absolutely guarantees that our children will have less of a quality of life than we’ve had.  – Senator Judd Gregg, New Hampshire

Source: http://www.iousathemovie.com/

Links: http://www.brillig.com/debt_clock/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Debt_Clock

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7660409.stm

Full Version Available Here:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=270867650600562607&ei=znjYSYfMOsHB-AbPqbS9Bg&q=I.O.U.S.A.&hl=en

Tags: , , , , , , ,

There is a leadership crisis in the world and America and the European Union must take the lead in addressing it, US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton told an audience of young Europeans in Parliament today (6 March).

eu-us-flag

In an invitation-only event entitled ‘The next generation takes the floor’, at which most participants appeared to be young employees or trainees of the EU institutions, Clinton complimented Europe on its integration, calling it an “extraordinary international effort”.

“Europe today is viewed by many as a miracle,” said Clinton, stressing that the EU is experiencing its “longest period of peace since the Roman Empire,” while the countries of the Union have never been more prosperous or more secure.

Speaking for her country, the head of the US diplomacy insisted that despite difficult problems ahead, the new administration is optimistic and “up to the task”.

Parliament President Hans-Gert Pöttering, who described Clinton as a “leader of vision” at a time that the world needs such leaders, also hinted that a new era is beginning in EU-US relations.

“Let us work as equal partners to build a better future,” Pöttering said.

In a carefully staged question-and-answer session, Clinton touched upon climate change, the fight against terrorism, the situation in the Middle East, relations with Russia, Darfur and gay rights.

The US secretary of state recognised that it will be difficult to get China, India, Indonesia and other countries to back an agreement at UN climate change talks in Copenhagen in December.

Moving on to a pet topics of the Bush administration, Clinton said her country’s ambition is to move towards a time when there is no fertile ground for terrorism, and clearly spoke in favour of establishing a viable Palestinian state. As for the situation in Africa, she stressed the need to build capacities within the continent that are capable of solving its many problems.

As for Russia, Clinton expressed satisfaction with yesterday’s decision by NATO to “re-energise” the NATO-Russia Council, which was frozen following the brief war in Georgia in August 2008.

She added that the US and Russia still strongly disagree on some areas, mentioning Georgia, the use by Moscow of energy “as a tool for intimidation” and the assumption by Russia that it has “spheres of influence” or veto rights over the NATO membership candidacies of Ukraine and Georgia.

Source: http://www.euractiv.com/en/opinion/clinton-sees-us-eu-leading-world/article-180031

Tags: , , ,

NEW YORK (Reuters) – Stocks fell on Wednesday as President Barack Obama’s first address to Congress shed little new light on how he plans to stabilize the economy and shore up banks, and gloomy home sales data fed the negative sentiment.

Obama said in his speech on Tuesday night the United States would emerge stronger from the ongoing crisis, but investors found little in what he said to spur buying after the market’s rebound on Tuesday from 1997 lows.

Reuters“He gave a very good speech in terms of making the citizens feel better about some of the things going on, but there is still a lot of work to be done,” said Tim Smalls, head of U.S. stock trading at brokerage Execution LLC in Greenwich, Connecticut.

The housing data “is another dose of reality,” he added.

Sales of previously owned U.S. homes plunged by a greater than expected 5.3 percent in January, an industry group reported.

Shares of financial services companies and big manufacturers led the market lower. Boeing (NYSE:BANews) and IBM (NYSE:IBMNews) were the top drags in the Dow, with declines of 6 percent and 2.5 percent respectively. The S&P financial index (^GSPFNews) fell 4.4 percent.

The Dow Jones industrial average (DJI:^DJINews) dropped 152.77 points, or 2.08 percent, to 7,198.17. The Standard & Poor’s 500 Index (^SPXNews) slipped 15.98 points, or 2.07 percent, to 757.16. The Nasdaq Composite Index (Nasdaq:^IXICNews) shrunk 32.24 points, or 2.24 percent, to 1,409.59.Google Finance

The slide marked a major setback after Tuesday’s attempted rebound from 12-year lows hit a day earlier.

On Nasdaq, shares of First Solar (NasdaqGS:FSLRNews) , a maker of thin-film solar modules, fell about 21 percent to $108.81 after the company gave a bleak short-term outlook for the industry.

Financial shares made a short comeback after Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke said in his second day of congressional testimony that regulators were not planning to nationalize Citigroup.

Shares of Citigroup (NYSE:CNews), down more than 60 percent year-to-date, briefly turned positive but later dropped 5 percent. The KBW bank index (Philadelphia:^BKXNews) fell 4 percent.

Shares of Lincoln National Corp. (NYSE:LNCNews) fell more than 19 percent after the company slashed its dividend more than 95 percent. The S&P Life Insurance index (^GSPLIFENews) dropped 9 percent.

U.S. regulators are due to begin tests on Wednesday to determine how much capital banks need. Even so, investors remain uncertain about how the government would relieve banks of money-losing assets and revive lending.

(Editing by Leslie Adler)

Source: http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Wall-St-falls-as-Obama-speech-rb-14464125.html

Tags: , , , ,

By Luke Baker

LONDON (Reuters) – Abuse of prisoners at Guantanamo Bay has worsened sharply since President Barack Obama took office as prison guards “get their kicks in” before the camp is closed, according to a lawyer who represents detainees.

enter

Abuses began to pick up in December after Obama was elected, human rights lawyer Ahmed Ghappour told Reuters. He cited beatings, the dislocation of limbs, spraying of pepper spray into closed cells, applying pepper spray to toilet paper and over-forcefeeding detainees who are on hunger strike.

The Pentagon said on Monday that it had received renewed reports of prisoner abuse during a recent review of conditions at Guantanamo, but had concluded that all prisoners were being kept in accordance with the Geneva Conventions.

“According to my clients, there has been a ramping up in abuse since President Obama was inaugurated,” said Ghappour, a British-American lawyer with Reprieve, a legal charity that represents 31 detainees at Guantanamo.

“If one was to use one’s imagination, (one) could say that these traumatized, and for lack of a better word barbaric, guards were just basically trying to get their kicks in right now for fear that they won’t be able to later,” he said.

“Certainly in my experience there have been many, many more reported incidents of abuse since the inauguration,” added Ghappour, who has visited Guantanamo six times since late September and based his comments on his own observations and conversations with both prisoners and guards.

Tags: , , ,

In his opening remarks to Bernanke, Ron Paul defends capitalism and warns against international fiat monetary schemes, which will exacerbate our economic woes.

Ron Paul’s opening statement (Bernanke hearings before House Comm.) 2009.02.25

Tags: , , , , , ,

Is Obama doing the right thing?

Tags: , , , ,

Religious groups that discriminate in hiring may still receive federal funding, as Bush declared in 2002. Democrats and civil libertarians are dismayed.

By Peter Wallsten and Duke Helfand
February 6, 2009
President Obama, shown at the National Prayer Breakfast, let stand a Bush executive order that religious organizations may discriminate on the basis of faith and still receive federal funding.
—President Obama, shown at the National Prayer Breakfast, let stand a Bush executive order that religious organizations may discriminate on the basis of faith and still receive federal funding.

Reporting from Los Angeles and Washington — It seemed like a firm campaign promise. Barack Obama pledged to continue President Bush’s faith-based office in the White House, but with a key change: Groups receiving federal money would no longer be allowed to discriminate in hiring on the basis of religion.

On Thursday, however, as President Obama disclosed the details of his faith-based program, he left the controversial Bush policy in place.

The decision angered Democrats and civil libertarians who thought Obama had agreed with their view that Bush’s 2002 executive order went too far.

“Based on what he said, we thought the issue had been resolved,” said Rep. Robert C. Scott (D-Va.).

“You’ll have to ask them why they think it’s all right to discriminate,” Scott said. He added that administration officials are “either offended by the idea of discrimination, or they’re not.”

But Thursday’s announcement surprised and pleased some religious leaders, particularly religious conservatives, who had a strong ally in Bush and had been pressing the Democratic president to revoke his earlier promise.

“I’m very excited about this,” said Frank Page, past president of the Southern Baptist Convention and one of more than two dozen religious leaders named Thursday to a new White House council that will advise Obama on faith-based issues. “I know he was struggling with this particular issue. But this will allow religious groups to be true to themselves.”

Obama announced that White House officials might seek guidance from the Justice Department if questions arise about the legality of potential grant recipients.

In essence, the executive order, which did not specifically mention discrimination, gives the White House the option to review a specific grant for legal reasons but does not overturn Bush’s broader policy.

Administration officials rejected the notion that Obama was backtracking on a campaign promise.

Tags: , , , ,

US President Barack Obama’s decision to step back from the previous administration’s plan to develop an anti-ballistic missile system in Eastern Europe is blocking ratification of the Lisbon Treaty by the Czech parliament, Czech analysts told EurActiv.

Czech Foreign Minister Karel Schwarzenberg said yesterday (29 January) that he expected the United States to consider delaying the Central European missile shield project, a day after Russia had reacted positively to a perceived shift in US policy (EurActiv 29/01/09).

barack_obama_06_tcm29-178678

Obama is expected to delay missile plans

“They will hardly call it off, but I can imagine a delay,” Schwarzenberg reportedly said in Vienna, where he attended a meeting of the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE).

“This doesn’t help the situation at all,” Lukas Pachta, political analyst at Europeum, an EU policy think-tank in Prague, told EurActiv.

“There appears to have been a deal between the main [ruling] coalition party and the main opposition party that if the missile agreement is approved, the Lisbon Treaty will be as well. Since the Lisbon Treaty is on ice and the missile shield is too, everything is blocked,” he explained.

The ruling party ODS is itself divided, he further elaborated. “The government and the ministers would rather go for the ratification of the Lisbon Treaty, but [ODS] members of parliament, especially in the Senate, are reluctant to vote on it. It is not certain that the Lisbon Treaty will go through the Senate. That’s why there has not yet been a real trial. As the government doesn’t want a failure, they would rather postpone it,” Pachta added.

Commenting on reports that the Senate could vote on 15 February (EurActiv 28/01/09), Pachta said there appear to be complications in the lower chamber too. “I don’t think the Lisbon Treaty will be ratified before the end of the presidency. But of course, any government official will say that they are doing their best,” argued the Czech analyst.

Vera Rihackova, an analyst from the same think-tank, added that the Senate committee also considered the political situation “unfavourable” for Lisbon Treaty ratification. In a statement, the Senate committee called for additional time, proposing to postpone ratification until the end of the Czech Presidency.

Source: http://www.euractiv.com/en/future-eu/obama-missile-stance-blocks-czech-lisbon-ratification/article-178994


Tags: , , ,

PolitiFact has compiled about 500 promises that Barack Obama made during the campaign and is tracking their progress on our Obameter. We rate their status as No Action, In the Works or Stalled. Once we find action is completed, we rate them Promise Kept, Compromise or Promise Broken.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/

Obamameter

Tags: , , ,